Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 0:27:15 GMT -5
UGT and CCOO have expressed their “resounding rejection” of the amendment presented by the PP for the pension reform. This Thursday, the plenary session of Congress debated the bill and the main opposition party has presented an amendment to the entirety against what it voted for in the Toledo Pact commission. The amendment has been rejected by all parliamentary groups, so the text agreed upon by the Government and the social agents will continue its parliamentary process. Both unions consider that the PP “shows a clear political contradiction” by voting in favor of the recommendations of the Toledo Pact and, later, presenting an amendment to the entire same agreement in the plenary session of Congress, “thereby transmitting a clear idea to re-establish the pension cuts contained in its 2013 reform and disregard both the Toledo Pact and the social dialogue agreement,” they said. CCOO and UGT accuse the 'popular' of wanting to "cut pensions and replace them with private systems.
In his opinion, the amendment presented "is riddled with inaccuracies, inventions and manipulated references", with the sole objective of returning to the 2013 reform unilaterally imposed by the then Rajoy government Australia Phone Number and which included measures as unpopular as the index of revaluation of pensions and the Sustainability Factor . “A reform that broke with the procedure to agree on pensions that had been followed in Spain for two decades, in a clear gesture of lack of democratic conviction, a will to unilaterally cut (and above all) public pensions, and an intention openly favoring its replacement by private capitalization systems, useful as complementary systems but, in no case, substitutes for the general and sufficient protection of public pensions," they say. For this reason, UGT and reject the position that underlies this devolution amendment and demand “loyal action within the framework of social dialogue and the Toledo Pact” (also voted for by the PP), as well as the negotiation of the.
Promotion of sustainability of the public system, focusing the debate on “the need to guarantee our pension system for current and future generations of pensioners.IN On the other hand, both unions have called for this Friday, October 1, International Day of Older Persons, a rally at 11:00 a.m. in front of the Congress of Deputies where they will deliver a manifesto with the demands of the group of pensioners and retirees, in defense of quality public social, health and dependency services; for decent and sufficient pensions for all people; and for banking attention to the elderly.both in the declarations of a state of alarm, emergency, calamity or epidemic and also in their extension over time, at the time of the hardest waves of the pandemic and in the intermediate phases of control, in which each has resorted to a comparable regulation of public health measures or has approved ad hoc emergency decrees, without these having provoked such a public debate. intense as ours about its suitability, much less such a polarized judicial response and in no case an absolute questioning by its Court of constitutional guarantees, as has occurred in Spain. On the other hand, the conclusions of the report do not seem to clarify much about pandemic-proof regulations, since once again the jurists questioned differ radically.
In his opinion, the amendment presented "is riddled with inaccuracies, inventions and manipulated references", with the sole objective of returning to the 2013 reform unilaterally imposed by the then Rajoy government Australia Phone Number and which included measures as unpopular as the index of revaluation of pensions and the Sustainability Factor . “A reform that broke with the procedure to agree on pensions that had been followed in Spain for two decades, in a clear gesture of lack of democratic conviction, a will to unilaterally cut (and above all) public pensions, and an intention openly favoring its replacement by private capitalization systems, useful as complementary systems but, in no case, substitutes for the general and sufficient protection of public pensions," they say. For this reason, UGT and reject the position that underlies this devolution amendment and demand “loyal action within the framework of social dialogue and the Toledo Pact” (also voted for by the PP), as well as the negotiation of the.
Promotion of sustainability of the public system, focusing the debate on “the need to guarantee our pension system for current and future generations of pensioners.IN On the other hand, both unions have called for this Friday, October 1, International Day of Older Persons, a rally at 11:00 a.m. in front of the Congress of Deputies where they will deliver a manifesto with the demands of the group of pensioners and retirees, in defense of quality public social, health and dependency services; for decent and sufficient pensions for all people; and for banking attention to the elderly.both in the declarations of a state of alarm, emergency, calamity or epidemic and also in their extension over time, at the time of the hardest waves of the pandemic and in the intermediate phases of control, in which each has resorted to a comparable regulation of public health measures or has approved ad hoc emergency decrees, without these having provoked such a public debate. intense as ours about its suitability, much less such a polarized judicial response and in no case an absolute questioning by its Court of constitutional guarantees, as has occurred in Spain. On the other hand, the conclusions of the report do not seem to clarify much about pandemic-proof regulations, since once again the jurists questioned differ radically.