Post by piya481 on Feb 18, 2024 2:45:40 GMT -5
Apple, the world's most valuable company, has faced an unusual wave of public dissent in recent years among its management staff, as well as unprecedented organizing campaigns by retail employees, who voted to unionize last year. last year in Maryland and Oklahoma .
Furthermore, the disagreements do not seem to Middle East Mobile Number List subside. After a thorough investigation, the US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has determined that Apple violates the rights of its workers. And, this complaint highlights the lack of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of the company towards its collaborators, a sector that influences their perception and social commitment.
Apple, the apple in contention
Although the brand has made important contributions to extend and achieve its climate objectives, throughout its entire value chain and in the life cycle of its products by 2030, it has not done the same with its collaborators.
The NLRB agents' findings determined that "several work rules, manual rules, and confidentiality rules at Apple" are illegal. This is because they "reasonably tend to interfere with, restrict or coerce employees" who are trying to assert their labor rights, said NLRB spokeswoman Kayla Blado.
The investigation involved several complaints dating back to 2021, Kayla Blado said, some of which accused Apple of interfering with employees' attempts to collect salary data and of "repressive activity that has enabled abuse and harassment of organizers." .
The complaint stemmed from cases filed by two former employees in 2021. Ashley Gjovik and Cher Scarlett accused the company of maintaining work rules that prohibit employees from discussing wages, hours or other terms or conditions of employment. Likewise, documents presented by Gjovik allege that in an email sent by CEO Tim Cook, he committed to punishing the company's information leakers.
Protection of labor rights
U.S. labor law protects the rights of workers to communicate with each other and engage in collective action on workplace issues. So complaints from NLRB prosecutors reached administrative law judges, whose rulings can advance to the labor board in Washington and, from there, to federal court.
While the NLRB lacks the ability to impose punitive damages or hold executives personally liable for violations, it can order companies to change workplace policies.
However, the NLRB has noted that it found merit in charges related to statements by high-level Apple executives, as well as policies that violated the National Labor Relations Act. So a decision of merit means that the agency has investigated the complaints and found sufficient evidence to support them.
apple-without-rse-
They call on Apple to take responsibility
Gjovik, a senior engineering program manager, was fired by Apple in September 2021 after filing complaints with several state and federal agencies. Since, in documents shared by Gjovik, Apple claimed that she was fired for violating policies such as the disclosure of confidential product information.
However, Gjovik indicated that her disclosures were legally protected and that she was fired in retaliation for her previous complaints, which included accusations of assault and discrimination based on sex. Likewise, Gjøvik publicly shared screenshots and internal messages along with some of her statements, through her Twitter account, denouncing Apple's lack of CSR in addressing the problem.
Furthermore, the disagreements do not seem to Middle East Mobile Number List subside. After a thorough investigation, the US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has determined that Apple violates the rights of its workers. And, this complaint highlights the lack of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of the company towards its collaborators, a sector that influences their perception and social commitment.
Apple, the apple in contention
Although the brand has made important contributions to extend and achieve its climate objectives, throughout its entire value chain and in the life cycle of its products by 2030, it has not done the same with its collaborators.
The NLRB agents' findings determined that "several work rules, manual rules, and confidentiality rules at Apple" are illegal. This is because they "reasonably tend to interfere with, restrict or coerce employees" who are trying to assert their labor rights, said NLRB spokeswoman Kayla Blado.
The investigation involved several complaints dating back to 2021, Kayla Blado said, some of which accused Apple of interfering with employees' attempts to collect salary data and of "repressive activity that has enabled abuse and harassment of organizers." .
The complaint stemmed from cases filed by two former employees in 2021. Ashley Gjovik and Cher Scarlett accused the company of maintaining work rules that prohibit employees from discussing wages, hours or other terms or conditions of employment. Likewise, documents presented by Gjovik allege that in an email sent by CEO Tim Cook, he committed to punishing the company's information leakers.
Protection of labor rights
U.S. labor law protects the rights of workers to communicate with each other and engage in collective action on workplace issues. So complaints from NLRB prosecutors reached administrative law judges, whose rulings can advance to the labor board in Washington and, from there, to federal court.
While the NLRB lacks the ability to impose punitive damages or hold executives personally liable for violations, it can order companies to change workplace policies.
However, the NLRB has noted that it found merit in charges related to statements by high-level Apple executives, as well as policies that violated the National Labor Relations Act. So a decision of merit means that the agency has investigated the complaints and found sufficient evidence to support them.
apple-without-rse-
They call on Apple to take responsibility
Gjovik, a senior engineering program manager, was fired by Apple in September 2021 after filing complaints with several state and federal agencies. Since, in documents shared by Gjovik, Apple claimed that she was fired for violating policies such as the disclosure of confidential product information.
However, Gjovik indicated that her disclosures were legally protected and that she was fired in retaliation for her previous complaints, which included accusations of assault and discrimination based on sex. Likewise, Gjøvik publicly shared screenshots and internal messages along with some of her statements, through her Twitter account, denouncing Apple's lack of CSR in addressing the problem.